Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: ProcessUtility_hook
- From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
- To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- Cc: Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: ProcessUtility_hook
- Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 20:35:27 -0500 (EST)
- Message-id: <200912010135.nB11ZRk25773@momjian.us> <text/plain>
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes: > > I have applied this patch, with only a minor wording improvement: > > Uh, we weren't even done reviewing this were we? Uh, I am new to this commitfest wiki thing, but it did have a review by Euler Taveira de Oliveira: https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=196 and the author replied. Is there more that needs to be done? -- Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ProcessUtility_hook
- From: Tom Lane
- Re: ProcessUtility_hook
- References:
- Re: ProcessUtility_hook
- From: Tom Lane
- Re: ProcessUtility_hook
- Prev by Date: Re: ProcessUtility_hook
- Next by Date: Re: ProcessUtility_hook
- Previous by thread: Re: ProcessUtility_hook
- Next by thread: Re: ProcessUtility_hook
- Indexes: