Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: ProcessUtility_hook
- From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
- Cc: Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: ProcessUtility_hook
- Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 20:33:05 -0500
- Message-id: <15694.1259631185@sss.pgh.pa.us> <text/plain>
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes: > I have applied this patch, with only a minor wording improvement: Uh, we weren't even done reviewing this were we? regards, tom lane
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ProcessUtility_hook
- From: Bruce Momjian
- Re: ProcessUtility_hook
- References:
- Re: ProcessUtility_hook
- From: Bruce Momjian
- Re: ProcessUtility_hook
- Prev by Date: Re: Deleted WAL files held open by backends in Linux
- Next by Date: Re: ProcessUtility_hook
- Previous by thread: Re: ProcessUtility_hook
- Next by thread: Re: ProcessUtility_hook
- Indexes: