Re: Application name patch - v4
- From: Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>
- To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
- Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: Re: Application name patch - v4
- Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 22:54:54 +0100
- Message-id: <31A521F5-FF0C-4FB1-923F-A6A0CEDDD4EF@hi-media.com> <text/plain>
Le 30 nov. 2009 à 22:38, Robert Haas a écrit :
> I still don't really understand why we wouldn't want RESET ALL to
> reset the application name. In what circumstances would you want the
> application name to stay the same across a RESET ALL?
I can't see any use case, but SET/RESET is tied to SESSION whereas application_name is a CONNECTION property. So it's a hard sell that reseting the session will change connection properties.
Regards,
--
dim
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index