Re: Writeable CTE patch
- From: Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi>
- To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- Cc: Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: Writeable CTE patch
- Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:00:13 +0200
- Message-id: <4B14163D.7090104@cs.helsinki.fi> <text/plain>
Tom Lane wrote:
It would be
altogether cleaner though if the CommandCounterIncrement responsibility
were in the same place it is now, ie the caller of the executor. Which
could be possible if we restructure the rewriter/planner output as a
list of Queries instead of just one. I'm not currently sure how hard
that would be, though; it might not be a practical answer.
I'm trying to avoid doing this, at least for now.
Regards,
Marko Tiikkaja
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index