Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: is isolation level 'Serializable' in pg not same as 'serializable' in SQL-92?
- From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
- To: 张茂森 <maosen(dot)zhang(at)alibaba-inc(dot)com>
- Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: is isolation level 'Serializable' in pg not same as 'serializable' in SQL-92?
- Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 12:37:22 -0500
- Message-id: <603c8f070911300937o19ccd750r37aaa676a8d9a023@mail.gmail.com> <text/plain>
2009/11/30 张茂森 <maosen(dot)zhang(at)alibaba-inc(dot)com>: > pgsql-hackers is not the right place for user questions; try pgsql-general or pgsql-novice. The answer to your question is in the documentation. You can find it here: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/static/transaction-iso.html#MVCC-SERIALIZABILITY ...Robert
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Add solaris path for docbook COLLATEINDEX
- Next by Date: Re: Initial refactoring of plperl.c [PATCH]
- Previous by thread: Cost of sort/order by not estimated by the query planner
- Next by thread: A thought about regex versus multibyte character sets
- Indexes: