Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: set the cost of an aggregate function
- From: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>
- To: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: Re: set the cost of an aggregate function
- Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:53:06 -0500
- Message-id: <3073cc9b0911300853t2778e9e5s7e29c9701f4965d@mail.gmail.com> <text/plain>
2009/11/30 Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>: > Hi, > > why we can't do $subject? it could have any benefit on the planner? > seems like while we can set the cost of the state transition function, that cost is not propagated... -- Atentamente, Jaime Casanova Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL AsesorÃa y desarrollo de sistemas Guayaquil - Ecuador Cel. +59387171157
- References:
- set the cost of an aggregate function
- From: Jaime Casanova
- set the cost of an aggregate function
- Prev by Date: Re: draft RFC: concept for partial, wal-based replication
- Next by Date: Cost of sort/order by not estimated by the query planner
- Previous by thread: set the cost of an aggregate function
- Next by thread: is isolation level 'Serializable' in pg not same as 'serializable' in SQL-92?
- Indexes: