Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: Patch: Remove gcc dependency in definition of inline functions
- From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
- To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
- Cc: Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kurt Harriman <harriman(at)acm(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: Patch: Remove gcc dependency in definition of inline functions
- Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:03:21 +0200
- Message-id: <1259589801.4134.4.camel@fsopti579.F-Secure.com> <text/plain>
On mån, 2009-11-30 at 07:06 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > I thought one problem was that inline is a suggestion that the compiler > can ignore, while macros have to be implemented as specified. Sure, but one could argue that a compiler that doesn't support inline usefully is probably not the sort of compiler that you use for compiling performance-relevant software anyway. We can support such systems in a degraded way for historical value and evaluation purposes as long as it's pretty much free, like we support systems without working int8.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Patch: Remove gcc dependency in definition of inline functions
- From: Bruce Momjian
- Re: Patch: Remove gcc dependency in definition of inline functions
- References:
- Re: Patch: Remove gcc dependency in definition of inline functions
- From: Bruce Momjian
- Re: Patch: Remove gcc dependency in definition of inline functions
- Prev by Date: Re: Feature request: permissions change history for auditing
- Next by Date: Re: Patch: Remove gcc dependency in definition of inline functions
- Previous by thread: Re: Patch: Remove gcc dependency in definition of inline functions
- Next by thread: Re: Patch: Remove gcc dependency in definition of inline functions
- Indexes: