Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: draft RFC: concept for partial, wal-based replication
- From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
- To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Cc: Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>, hs(at)cybertec(dot)at
- Subject: Re: draft RFC: concept for partial, wal-based replication
- Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:14:16 +0100
- Message-id: <200911300914.16457.andres@anarazel.de> <text/plain>
On Monday 30 November 2009 03:57:11 Itagaki Takahiro wrote: > Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at> wrote: > > we tried to discuss on a lower level what should be needed > > for a partial replication based on streaming replication. > We need to discuss a "partial recovery" before the partial replication. If you do the filtering on the sending side you dont actually need partial recover in the sense that you filter in the rmgr or similar. Or do I miss something? Andres
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: draft RFC: concept for partial, wal-based replication
- From: Stefan Kaltenbrunner
- Re: draft RFC: concept for partial, wal-based replication
- From: Itagaki Takahiro
- Re: draft RFC: concept for partial, wal-based replication
- References:
- Re: draft RFC: concept for partial, wal-based replication
- From: Boszormenyi Zoltan
- Re: draft RFC: concept for partial, wal-based replication
- From: Itagaki Takahiro
- Re: draft RFC: concept for partial, wal-based replication
- Prev by Date: set the cost of an aggregate function
- Next by Date: Re: draft RFC: concept for partial, wal-based replication
- Previous by thread: Re: draft RFC: concept for partial, wal-based replication
- Next by thread: Re: draft RFC: concept for partial, wal-based replication
- Indexes: