| From: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Summary and Plan for Hot Standby |
| Date: | 2009-11-15 19:56:17 |
| Message-ID: | 4B005CE1.1020305@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs wrote:
> You agree there should be two phases?
I'm hesitant to say 'yes', because then you will harass me with "but you
said that you would be OK with fixing X, Y, Z later! Why don't you
commit already!".
Of course there should be several phases! We've *already* punted a lot
of stuff from this first increment we're currently working on. The
criteria for getting this first phase committed is: could we release
with no further changes?
If you actually want to help, can you please focus on fixing the
must-fix bugs we know about? We can then discuss which of the remaining
known issues we're willing to live with.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Chernow | 2009-11-15 19:56:19 | Re: named parameters in SQL functions |
| Previous Message | David E. Wheeler | 2009-11-15 19:51:57 | Re: named parameters in SQL functions |