Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Peripheral Links

Header And Logo

PostgreSQL
| The world's most advanced open source database.

Site Navigation

Search archives
  Advanced Search

Re: Syntax for partitioning


  • From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
  • To: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
  • Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
  • Subject: Re: Syntax for partitioning
  • Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 17:16:16 -0400
  • Message-id: <21974.1256937376@sss.pgh.pa.us> <text/plain>

Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> writes:
> I haven't looked at all of these places yet, so maybe a few simple
> changes would allow us to treat typmod as a full 32 bits. Or perhaps it
> could just be expanded to a signed 64-bit int. What do you think?

Neither is likely to happen, and even disregarding that, I doubt people
would be real happy with a design like this.  Where are you going to
put the typmod for the contained type?

			regards, tom lane



Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996 – 2012 PostgreSQL Global Development Group