Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: Syntax for partitioning
- From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
- To: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
- Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: Syntax for partitioning
- Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 19:12:11 +0200
- Message-id: <4AEB1E6B.5030000@enterprisedb.com> <text/plain>
Jeff Davis wrote: > On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 10:03 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> I can't help but wonder if the period type might better be a generic >> container for pairs of scalar, totally-ordered types. > > That would be ideal. However, it doesn't really look like our type > system was built to handle that kind of thing. > > We could use typmod, I suppose, but even that won't hold a full Oid. Any > ideas/suggestions? Wait, it doesn't? A typmod is a 32-bit integer, like Oids. Am I missing something? -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Syntax for partitioning
- From: Jeff Davis
- Re: Syntax for partitioning
- References:
- Syntax for partitioning
- From: Itagaki Takahiro
- Re: Syntax for partitioning
- From: Peter Eisentraut
- Re: Syntax for partitioning
- From: Jeff Davis
- Re: Syntax for partitioning
- From: Peter Eisentraut
- Re: Syntax for partitioning
- From: Jeff Davis
- Syntax for partitioning
- Prev by Date: Re: some dead code in functioncmds.c
- Next by Date: Re: some dead code in functioncmds.c
- Previous by thread: Re: Syntax for partitioning
- Next by thread: Re: Syntax for partitioning
- Indexes: