Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: Syntax for partitioning
- From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
- To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
- Cc: Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: Syntax for partitioning
- Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 09:12:40 -0700
- Message-id: <1256919160.27737.55.camel@jdavis> <text/plain>
On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 10:03 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > I can't help but wonder if the period type might better be a generic > container for pairs of scalar, totally-ordered types. That would be ideal. However, it doesn't really look like our type system was built to handle that kind of thing. We could use typmod, I suppose, but even that won't hold a full Oid. Any ideas/suggestions? Regards, Jeff Davis
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Syntax for partitioning
- From: Heikki Linnakangas
- Re: Syntax for partitioning
- References:
- Syntax for partitioning
- From: Itagaki Takahiro
- Re: Syntax for partitioning
- From: Peter Eisentraut
- Re: Syntax for partitioning
- From: Jeff Davis
- Re: Syntax for partitioning
- From: Peter Eisentraut
- Syntax for partitioning
- Prev by Date: Re: some dead code in functioncmds.c
- Next by Date: draft RFC: concept for partial, wal-based replication
- Previous by thread: Re: Syntax for partitioning
- Next by thread: Re: Syntax for partitioning
- Indexes: