Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Peripheral Links

Header And Logo

PostgreSQL
| The world's most advanced open source database.

Site Navigation

Search archives
  Advanced Search

Re: Buffer usage in EXPLAIN and pg_stat_statements (review)


  • From: Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
  • To: Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>
  • Cc: Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
  • Subject: Re: Buffer usage in EXPLAIN and pg_stat_statements (review)
  • Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2009 11:40:27 +0900
  • Message-id: <20091001112006.9C36.52131E4D@oss.ntt.co.jp> <text/plain>

Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com> wrote:

> > But there are some confusions in postgres; ReadBufferCount and
> > BufferHitCount are used for "get" and "hit", but "heap_blks_read"
> > and "heap_blks_hit" are used for "read" and "hit" in pg_statio_all_tables.
> I see. :(

I fixed the confusions of get, hit and read in your patch.
    long	num_hit = ReadBufferCount + ReadLocalBufferCount;
    long	num_read = num_hit - BufferHitCount - LocalBufferHitCount;
should be
    long	num_get = ReadBufferCount + ReadLocalBufferCount;
    long	num_hit = BufferHitCount + LocalBufferHitCount;
    long	num_read = num_get - num_hit;

ReadBufferCount means "number of buffer access" :(

Patch attached.

Regards,
---
ITAGAKI Takahiro
NTT Open Source Software Center

Attachment: buffer_usage_20091001.patch
Description: Binary data



Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996 – 2012 PostgreSQL Global Development Group