Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: Revised signal multiplexer patch
- From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
- Cc: jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: Revised signal multiplexer patch
- Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 13:40:23 -0400
- Message-id: <24211.1249062023@sss.pgh.pa.us> <text/plain>
Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> writes: > But there is one issue; the extra search is always required to send a notify > interrupt. This is because pg_listener doesn't have a backend ID and we > cannot pass it to SendProcSignal. In order to solve this issue, we should > newly add backend ID field into pg_listener? Hmm. I'm not tremendously concerned about that --- the LISTEN/NOTIFY code has been on the agenda for a complete rewrite for a long time now, and I keep hoping pg_listener will go away entirely sometime soon. I don't feel a need to go and fix a marginal performance issue there. regards, tom lane
- References:
- Revised signal multiplexer patch
- From: Fujii Masao
- Revised signal multiplexer patch
- Prev by Date: Re: 8.4 win32 shared memory patch
- Next by Date: Re: 8.4 win32 shared memory patch
- Previous by thread: Revised signal multiplexer patch
- Next by thread: Re: Revised signal multiplexer patch
- Indexes: