Re: Hot standby and b-tree killed items

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Hot standby and b-tree killed items
Date: 2008-12-23 12:52:37
Message-ID: 1230036757.4793.803.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On Fri, 2008-12-19 at 14:23 -0600, Kevin Grittner wrote:

> > I guess making it that SQLSTATE would make it simpler to understand
> why
> > the error occurs and also how to handle it (i.e. resubmit).
>
> Precisely.

Just confirming I will implement the SQLSTATE as requested.

I recognize my own and Greg's arguments that the match is not perfect,
but the Standard isn't clear on this and Kevin's interpretation is the
more useful behaviour for developers.

--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavan Deolasee 2008-12-23 13:06:47 Re: Sync Rep: First Thoughts on Code
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2008-12-23 12:25:21 Re: Sync Rep: First Thoughts on Code