Skip site navigation
(1)
Skip section navigation
(2)
Search
Peripheral Links
Text Size:
Normal
/
Large
Donate
Contact
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Home
About
Downloads
Documentation
Community
Developers
Support
Section Navigation
Community
Contributors
Mailing Lists
Subscribe
User lists
Developer lists
pgsql-committers
pgsql-hackers
pgsql-rrreviewers
pgsql-www
Regional lists
Associations
User groups
Project lists
Inactive lists
IRC
Featured Users
International Sites
Propaganda
Resources
Weekly News
Community login
Profile
Lost password
Search archives
Advanced Search
Year 2038 Bug?
From
: "David E. Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To
: PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject
: Year 2038 Bug?
Date
: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:52:36 -0700
Message-id
: <
4D65801C-C71F-46C6-9AE9-BB60A35C8A0F@kineticode.com
> <
text/plain
>
Howdy,
Not sure if PostgreSQL uses time_t, but if so, this project provides
useful code (a drop-in replacement for time.h) to address the 2038 bug
on 32-bit platforms.
http://code.google.com/p/y2038/
Useful for PostgreSQL? Best, David
Follow-Ups
:
Re: Year 2038 Bug?
From:
Tom Lane
Prev by Date:
Re: A small note about the difficulty of managing subprojects
Next by Date:
Re: Year 2038 Bug?
Previous by thread:
out-of-date comment in auto-generated oidjoins.sql
Next by thread:
Re: Year 2038 Bug?
Indexes:
Main
Thread
Home
|
Main Index
|
Thread Index
Privacy Policy
| PostgreSQL Archives hosted by
Command Prompt, Inc.
| Designed by
tinysofa
Copyright © 1996 – 2008 PostgreSQL Global Development Group