Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
pgsql-hackers 2008-07 Chronological Index (1/9)
Last updated: Wed Jan 18 03:10:54 2012
1494 messages
31 July 2008
Re: Should creating a new base type require superuser status? Tom Lane (21:23)
Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) ver_03 Alvaro Herrera (21:09)
Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) ver_03 Alvaro Herrera (20:43)
Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) ver_03 Robert Lor (20:21)
Re: Fixing DISTINCT ON for duplicate keys David Fetter (20:06)
Re: Should creating a new base type require superuser status? Kris Jurka (19:45)
Re: Fixing DISTINCT ON for duplicate keys Tom Lane (19:10)
Re: Plans for 8.4 Henry B. Hotz (18:44)
Re: Creating Universal OSX binaries Tom Lane (18:39)
Creating Universal OSX binaries Bruce Momjian (18:29)
Re: window function v03 against HEAD David Fetter (18:26)
Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) ver_03 Alvaro Herrera (18:24)
Re: Fixing DISTINCT ON for duplicate keys David Fetter (18:03)
compilig libpq with borland 5.5 claudio lezcano (17:52)
Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types David E. Wheeler (17:42)
Fixing DISTINCT ON for duplicate keys Tom Lane (17:38)
Re: pg_regress inputdir Alvaro Herrera (17:25)
Re: window function v03 against HEAD Hitoshi Harada (17:14)
Re: pg_regress inputdir Alvaro Herrera (17:13)
Re: window function v03 against HEAD David Fetter (16:35)
Re: [PATCHES] odd output in restore mode Tom Lane (16:33)
Re: [PATCHES] odd output in restore mode Heikki Linnakangas (16:05)
Re: Dumping datconfig Magnus Hagander (15:09)
Re: Plans for 8.4 Magnus Hagander (14:59)
Dumping datconfig Magnus Hagander (14:54)
Re: window function v03 against HEAD Hitoshi Harada (14:00)
Re: Should creating a new base type require superuser status? Andrew Sullivan (08:40)
Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types Dimitri Fontaine (07:50)
Re: [PATCH] "\ef <function>" in psql Abhijit Menon-Sen (07:08)
Re: window function v03 against HEAD David Fetter (06:53)
Re: window function v03 against HEAD Hitoshi Harada (05:46)
Re: window function v03 against HEAD David Fetter (05:33)
Re: window function v03 against HEAD Hitoshi Harada (05:12)
opportunity for time on large itanium system Mark Wong (04:09)
Re: Plans for 8.4 Tom Lane (03:01)
Re: Plans for 8.4 Stephen Frost (02:48)
Re: Plans for 8.4 Henry B. Hotz (02:22)
30 July 2008
Re: printing raw parse tree Tom Lane (23:11)
Re: printing raw parse tree Tatsuo Ishii (22:57)
Re: Should creating a new base type require superuser status? Tom Lane (22:13)
Re: Should creating a new base type require superuser status? Alvaro Herrera (22:08)
Re: Should creating a new base type require superuser status? Gregory Stark (22:01)
Re: Should creating a new base type require superuser status? Tom Lane (21:29)
Re: Should creating a new base type require superuser status? Gregory Stark (21:19)
Re: Copy storage parameters on CREATE TABLE LIKE/INHERITS daveg (20:39)
Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types David E. Wheeler (20:11)
Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types Tom Lane (20:10)
Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types Tom Lane (19:58)
Should creating a new base type require superuser status? Tom Lane (19:50)
Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types David E. Wheeler (18:28)
Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types David E. Wheeler (18:28)
Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types Tom Lane (18:09)
Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types Kevin Grittner (17:55)
Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types David E. Wheeler (17:42)
Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types Tom Lane (17:34)
Re: [PATCHES] odd output in restore mode Martin Zaun (16:51)
Re: TABLE-function patch vs plpgsql Pavel Stehule (15:18)
Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types Ryan Bradetich (15:11)
Re: printing raw parse tree Tom Lane (14:56)
Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types Tom Lane (14:51)
Re: pg_regress inputdir Jorgen Austvik - Sun Norway (14:48)
Re: TABLE-function patch vs plpgsql Hannu Krosing (14:31)
Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types Tom Lane (14:26)
Re: pg_regress inputdir Alvaro Herrera (14:14)
Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types Gregory Stark (10:09)
Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact? Stephen R. van den Berg (10:05)
Re: pg_regress inputdir Jorgen Austvik - Sun Norway (08:35)
printing raw parse tree Tatsuo Ishii (08:29)
Re: about postgres-r setup. leiyonghua (08:26)
Re: Postgres-R: internal messaging Markus Wanner (08:07)
Re: about postgres-r setup. Markus Wanner (07:56)
Re: [PATCH] "\ef <function>" in psql Abhijit Menon-Sen (07:49)
Copy storage parameters on CREATE TABLE LIKE/INHERITS ITAGAKI Takahiro (07:45)
Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types Ryan Bradetich (07:24)
Re: TABLE-function patch vs plpgsql Pavel Stehule (06:40)
Re: TABLE-function patch vs plpgsql Hannu Krosing (06:20)
Re: TABLE-function patch vs plpgsql Pavel Stehule (05:29)
Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) ver_03 Robert Lor (04:35)
Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 David Fetter (04:21)
modifying views Robert Haas (02:12)
Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types David E. Wheeler (00:52)
Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types Tom Lane (00:00)
29 July 2008
Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types Tom Lane (22:35)
Re: gsoc, oprrest function for text search take 2 Jan Urbański (22:17)
Re: about postgres-r setup. Markus Wanner (22:14)
Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types David E. Wheeler (22:07)
Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types Tom Lane (21:33)
Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types David E. Wheeler (21:16)
Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types Tom Lane (21:00)
Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types David E. Wheeler (20:25)
Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types Tom Lane (20:12)
Re: [PATCH] "\ef <function>" in psql David Fetter (19:24)
Re: Python 2.5 vs the buildfarm Zdenek Kotala (19:22)
Re: TABLE-function patch vs plpgsql Tom Lane (19:17)
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Zdenek Kotala (19:16)
Type Categories for User-Defined Types David E . Wheeler (18:54)
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Tom Lane (18:41)
Re: [PATCH] "\ef <function>" in psql Robert Haas (18:21)
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? David E. Wheeler (18:03)
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Tom Lane (18:01)
Re: Python 2.5 vs the buildfarm Andrew Dunstan (17:23)
Re: TABLE-function patch vs plpgsql Hannu Krosing (17:10)
Re: Python 2.5 vs the buildfarm Greg Smith (17:03)
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? David E. Wheeler (16:59)
Re: TABLE-function patch vs plpgsql Asko Oja (16:48)
Re: TABLE-function patch vs plpgsql Tom Lane (16:46)
Re: TABLE-function patch vs plpgsql Hannu Krosing (16:27)
Re: Python 2.5 vs the buildfarm Tom Lane (16:25)
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? David E. Wheeler (16:10)
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Tom Lane (15:59)
Re: Python 2.5 vs the buildfarm Gregory Stark (15:48)
Re: patch: Add a separate TRUNCATE permission Tom Lane (15:08)
Re: Python 2.5 vs the buildfarm Tom Lane (14:57)
Re: pg_regress inputdir Alvaro Herrera (14:44)
Location of ident code Magnus Hagander (14:42)
Re: [PATCHES] odd output in restore mode Heikki Linnakangas (14:27)
Re: Relicensed and downloadable (Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact?) Stephen R. van den Berg (14:04)
Re: Python 2.5 vs the buildfarm Zdenek Kotala (13:30)
pg_regress inputdir Jorgen Austvik - Sun Norway (13:16)
Re: patch: Add a separate TRUNCATE permission Stephen Frost (13:11)
Re: patch: Add a separate TRUNCATE permission Stephen Frost (13:03)
Re: patch: Add a separate TRUNCATE permission Robert Haas (12:31)
Re: patch: Add a separate TRUNCATE permission Peter Eisentraut (12:25)
Re: Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches [try#2] KaiGai Kohei (12:25)
Re: Python 2.5 vs the buildfarm Peter Eisentraut (12:21)
Re: Python 2.5 vs the buildfarm Greg Sabino Mullane (11:24)
Re: patch: Add a separate TRUNCATE permission Stephen Frost (11:08)
Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level Gregory Stark (10:56)
Re: [PATCH] "\ef <function>" in psql Asko Oja (10:56)
Relicensed and downloadable (Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact?) Stephen R. van den Berg (10:55)
Re: [PATCH] "\ef <function>" in psql Asko Oja (10:52)
Re: [PATCH] "\ef <function>" in psql Abhijit Menon-Sen (10:13)
Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level Peter Eisentraut (08:41)
Re: patch: Add a separate TRUNCATE permission Peter Eisentraut (08:05)
Re: gsoc, oprrest function for text search take 2 Heikki Linnakangas (08:02)
Re: Python 2.5 vs the buildfarm Peter Eisentraut (07:58)
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Peter Eisentraut (07:53)
Re: gsoc, oprrest function for text search Jan Urbański (07:27)
Re: gsoc, oprrest function for text search Heikki Linnakangas (07:24)
Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 Pavel Stehule (06:42)
Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact? tomas (06:09)
Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) ver_03 Robert Lor (05:23)
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Tom Lane (01:32)
Re: window function v03 against HEAD David Fetter (01:24)
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? David E. Wheeler (00:57)
Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 Andrew Gierth (00:53)
Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) ver_03 Tom Lane (00:11)
28 July 2008
Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) ver_03 Robert Lor (23:39)
Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 Tom Lane (23:18)
Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) ver_03 Robert Lor (23:18)
Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support. Tom Lane (23:13)
Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 Andrew Dunstan (23:09)
Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 Tom Lane (23:04)
Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support. Gregory Stark (22:54)
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Tom Lane (22:48)
Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 Martijn van Oosterhout (22:24)
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Dawid Kuroczko (22:16)
Re: CVS Head psql bug? Guillaume Smet (22:12)
Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 Andrew Gierth (22:00)
Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support. Decibel! (21:30)
Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact? Stephen R. van den Berg (21:04)
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Martijn van Oosterhout (20:40)
Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 Gregory Stark (20:30)
Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact? Francisco Figueiredo Jr. (20:22)
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Andrew Dunstan (20:05)
Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 Andrew Gierth (20:00)
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Tom Lane (19:49)
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Andrew Dunstan (19:43)
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? Tom Lane (19:29)
Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 Tom Lane (19:16)
Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 Andrew Gierth (18:59)
Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 Tom Lane (18:49)
Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact? Andrew Garner (18:36)
Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact? Stephen R. van den Berg (18:29)