Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: Buildfarm member gypsy_moth seems not to like alignment patch
- From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- To: Jorgen Austvik - Sun Norway <Jorgen(dot)Austvik(at)Sun(dot)COM>
- Cc: Gorm(dot)Andersen(at)Sun(dot)COM, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: Buildfarm member gypsy_moth seems not to like alignment patch
- Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 12:49:50 -0500
Jorgen Austvik - Sun Norway <Jorgen(dot)Austvik(at)Sun(dot)COM> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> This is unfortunate and surprising, since that patch was intended to >> prevent compilers from making unsafe alignment assumptions, but it sure >> looks like this compiler has instead added a new one. Could you poke >> into it --- at least get a stack trace from the core dump? > Running initdb with debug: Hah, I guess the problem is that the compiler decided it was okay to put the local variable "chunk_data" at an unaligned address. Patched, but we'll have to see whether any other places have similar issues. Thanks for doing the gdb-work. regards, tom lane
- References:
- Buildfarm member gypsy_moth seems not to like alignment patch
- From: Tom Lane
- Re: Buildfarm member gypsy_moth seems not to like alignment patch
- From: Jorgen Austvik - Sun Norway
- Buildfarm member gypsy_moth seems not to like alignment patch
- Prev by Date: Re: Read-ahead and parallelism in redo recovery
- Next by Date: Re: [BUGS] bug or not bug, xmlvalidate(xml, text) can read and show one line from file
- Previous by thread: Re: Buildfarm member gypsy_moth seems not to like alignment patch
- Next by thread: ES7000 Windows 2003 server 64bit processor
- Indexes: