Re: pipe chunking vs Windows

[Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>]

Andreas Pflug wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>   
> >  
> > Not for Wordpad though, and it's pretty universal too. And Notepad
> > won't load a file of any great size anyway. Furthermore, we just can't
> > have this alongside the pipe chunking protocol, so I'm inclined to
> > blow it away altogether, unless there are pretty loud squawks.
> > Especially for machine-readable logs, we want the log file to get
> > *exactly* what we send it.
> >     
> Well I'd LOVE reliably machine-readable logs, but I think that will
> collide with human-readability.
>
>
>   
No it won't. Watch this space :-)

cheers

andrew