Re: strange buildfarm failure on lionfish
- From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
- Cc: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: Re: strange buildfarm failure on lionfish
- Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 16:06:08 -0400
- Message-id: <15450(dot)1185307568(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> While I don't have any very strong objection to putting an ORDER BY
>> on these particular queries, I'm worried about how many other regression
>> tests will now start showing random failures. We have an awful lot
>> of small tables in the tests ...
> Maybe what we could do is set higher thresholds for the regression
> database with ALTER DATABASE.
That seems to make sense at least as a short-term response. We weren't
seeing buildfarm failures with the previous defaults, so setting those
values with ALTER oughta do it.
regards, tom lane
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index