Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: Winner of naming discussions: Synchronous Commit
- From: Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
- Cc: Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD <Andreas(dot)Zeugswetter(at)s-itsolutions(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: Winner of naming discussions: Synchronous Commit
- Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 09:30:38 +0100
- Message-id: <467F7D2E(dot)3070707(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Simon Riggs wrote:
So, although its a knife edge decision, I'd say go withsynchronous_commit = off.
I agree - I'm not entirely sure why but it just feels more natural than asynchronous_commit = on. Plus the reasons you give seem valid.
Regards, Dave
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Winner of naming discussions: Synchronous Commit
- From: Jim Nasby
- Re: Winner of naming discussions: Synchronous Commit
- References:
- Winner of naming discussions: Synchronous Commit
- From: Simon Riggs
- Re: Winner of naming discussions: Synchronous Commit
- From: Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD
- Re: Winner of naming discussions: Synchronous Commit
- From: Simon Riggs
- Winner of naming discussions: Synchronous Commit
- Prev by Date: Re: msvc and vista fun
- Next by Date: Re: msvc and vista fun
- Previous by thread: Re: Winner of naming discussions: Synchronous Commit
- Next by thread: Re: Winner of naming discussions: Synchronous Commit
- Indexes: