Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: TOAST usage setting
- From: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
- To: "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
- Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: Re: TOAST usage setting
- Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 09:49:11 +0100
"Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes: > shared_buffers again was 32MB so all the data was in memory. The case where all the data is in memory is simply not interesting. The cost of TOAST is the random access seeks it causes. You seem to be intentionally avoiding testing the precise thing we're interested in. -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: TOAST usage setting
- From: Gregory Stark
- Re: TOAST usage setting
- References:
- Re: TOAST usage setting
- From: Bruce Momjian
- Re: TOAST usage setting
- Prev by Date: Re: Ye olde drop-the-database-you-just-left problem
- Next by Date: Re: TOAST usage setting
- Previous by thread: Re: TOAST usage setting
- Next by thread: Re: TOAST usage setting
- Indexes: