Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: Feature freeze progress report
- From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
- To: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
- Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: Re: Feature freeze progress report
- Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 07:54:40 -0400
Marc G. Fournier wrote
patches held over from feature freeze from the previous release will be reviewed within two months of the tree re-openinga. why 2 months? shouldn't they be given priority, period?
Yes, but they don't always seem to get it.
b. what happens after 2 months? we delete them?
Of course not. What I am suggesting is that we set ourselves review targets. The if we start to get in danger of missing them the authors and/or anyone else can legitimately start ringing alarm bells.
cheers andrew
- References:
- Feature freeze progress report
- From: Bruce Momjian
- Re: Feature freeze progress report
- From: Simon Riggs
- Re: Feature freeze progress report
- From: Heikki Linnakangas
- Re: Feature freeze progress report
- From: Dave Page
- Re: Feature freeze progress report
- From: Andrew Dunstan
- Re: Feature freeze progress report
- From: Marc G. Fournier
- Feature freeze progress report
- Prev by Date: Re: Feature freeze progress report
- Next by Date: Re: Feature freeze progress report
- Previous by thread: Re: Feature freeze progress report
- Next by thread: Re: Feature freeze progress report
- Indexes: