Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: Autovacuum vs statement_timeout
- From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
- To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
- Subject: Re: Autovacuum vs statement_timeout
- Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 00:36:01 +0200
Tom Lane wrote: > I seem to remember that we'd agreed that autovacuum should ignore any > globally set statement_timeout, on the grounds that a poorly chosen > setting could indefinitely prevent large tables from being vacuumed. On a vaguely related matter, should programs such as pg_dump, vacuumdb, and reindexdb disable statement_timeout? -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
- References:
- Autovacuum vs statement_timeout
- From: Tom Lane
- Autovacuum vs statement_timeout
- Prev by Date: Re: Last minute mini-proposal (I know, I know)forPQexecf()
- Next by Date: Macros for typtype (was Re: Arrays of Complex Types)
- Previous by thread: Re: Autovacuum vs statement_timeout
- Next by thread: Minor changes to Recovery related code
- Indexes: