Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: CIC and deadlocks
- From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- To: "Pavan Deolasee" <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>
- Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: Re: CIC and deadlocks
- Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 11:38:30 -0400
"Pavan Deolasee" <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com> writes: > Isn't CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY prone deadlock conditions ? Can you give a specific example? The deadlock code will grant locks out-of-order in cases where the alternative is to abort somebody. I think you may be describing a missed opportunity in that logic, more than a reason to add still another fragile assumption for HOT. regards, tom lane
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: CIC and deadlocks
- From: Pavan Deolasee
- Re: CIC and deadlocks
- References:
- CIC and deadlocks
- From: Pavan Deolasee
- CIC and deadlocks
- Prev by Date: Re: Last minute mini-proposal (I know, I know) forPQexecf()
- Next by Date: Re: Last minute mini-proposal (I know, I know) forPQexecf()
- Previous by thread: Re: CIC and deadlocks
- Next by thread: Re: CIC and deadlocks
- Indexes: