Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design

["Pavan Deolasee" <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>]

On 3/31/07, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:

On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 13:54 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:

>
> Hm.  So anytime we reject a potentially useful index as being not valid
> yet, we mark the plan as "only good for this top-level transaction"?
> That seems possibly workable --- in particular it doesn't get more
> complicated as soon as you consider multiple such indexes.

I like that because its specific in dealing with the exact issue we have
- it doesn't rely on many other things happening correctly.

Ok. Cool. I would finish this work then.
 

...and it also seems to provide a new route to avoiding the CIC wait.

Yeah, though I would like to take that up later.

Thanks,
Pavan
 

-- 

EnterpriseDB     
http://www.enterprisedb.com