Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: Proposal: include PL/Proxy into core
- From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
- To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Cc: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net>, Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>
- Subject: Re: Proposal: include PL/Proxy into core
- Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 11:49:25 -0700
Hannu, Marko, I, personally, think that it's worth talking about integrating these. However, the old versions were definitely NOT ready for integration, and the new versions went on the internet like a week ago. Heck, I haven't even downloaded them yet. Can we address these on the 8.4 timeline? That will give the rest of us in the community time to download, try and debug the new SkyTools. I know I'm planning on testing them and will know a lot more about your code/performance in a few months. Is there a reason why getting PL/proxy into 8.3 is critical? -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL @ Sun San Francisco
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Proposal: include PL/Proxy into core
- From: Marko Kreen
- Re: Proposal: include PL/Proxy into core
- References:
- Proposal: include PL/Proxy into core
- From: Marko Kreen
- Re: Proposal: include PL/Proxy into core
- From: Hannu Krosing
- Proposal: include PL/Proxy into core
- Prev by Date: Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design
- Next by Date: Re: Arrays of Complex Types
- Previous by thread: Re: Proposal: include PL/Proxy into core
- Next by thread: Re: Proposal: include PL/Proxy into core
- Indexes: