Re: TODO: GNU TLS

[Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>]

"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Currently, Tom Lane does not like how invasive the patch is.

If GNUTLS really wants to take market share from OpenSSL, why don't they
provide a more nearly compatible API?  I don't see why we should have
to jump through so many hoops in order to satify someone else's license
fetish.  (And it is a fetish, because only a compulsively narrow-minded
reading of the licenses yields the conclusion that there's a problem.)

			regards, tom lane