| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal: syntax of operation with tsearch's configuration |
| Date: | 2006-11-17 20:09:52 |
| Message-ID: | 200611172109.53873.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> We should also take the opportunity to discuss new keywords for the
> XML support -- will we use new grammar, or functions?
The XML stuff is defined in the SQL standard and there are existing
implementations, so any nonstandard syntax is going to be significantly
less useful. (The other problem is that you can't implement most of
the stuff in functions anyway.)
I don't see any comparable arguments about this full-text search stuff.
In particular I don't see any arguments why a change would necessary at
all, including why moving to core would be necessary in the first
place.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-11-17 20:12:53 | Re: Proposal: syntax of operation with tsearch's configuration |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2006-11-17 20:02:57 | Re: Proposal: syntax of operation with tsearch's configuration |