Re: On-disk bitmap index patch

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: On-disk bitmap index patch
Date: 2006-07-25 22:16:51
Message-ID: 24886.1153865811@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> If you have to hit one tuple out of four, it's pretty much guaranteed
>> that you will need to fetch every heap page.

> I think it's not uncommon to have data that is more clustered than expected.

Sure, if the data is fairly static ... and now that there's a fillfactor
option for heaps, you can even tolerate (some low rate of) updates
without losing the clusteredness. However, that benefit accrues to
all index types not only bitmap.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bort, Paul 2006-07-25 22:22:04 Re: GUC with units, details
Previous Message Michael Glaesemann 2006-07-25 22:14:52 Re: GUC with units, details