Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: [GENERAL] UUID's as primary keys
- From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- To: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
- Cc: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Thomas Hallgren <thomas(at)tada(dot)se>, Psql_General <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: Re: [GENERAL] UUID's as primary keys
- Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 12:12:53 -0400
Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> writes: > In the current setup the only reason for Postgres to have this data type at > all is purely for legacy compatibility. Yes. So? regards, tom lane
- References:
- Re: [GENERAL] UUID's as primary keys
- From: Greg Stark
- Re: [GENERAL] UUID's as primary keys
- From: Tom Lane
- Re: [GENERAL] UUID's as primary keys
- From: Greg Stark
- Re: [GENERAL] UUID's as primary keys
- From: Martijn van Oosterhout
- Re: [GENERAL] UUID's as primary keys
- From: Greg Stark
- Re: [GENERAL] UUID's as primary keys
- From: Thomas Hallgren
- Re: [GENERAL] UUID's as primary keys
- From: Martijn van Oosterhout
- Re: [GENERAL] UUID's as primary keys
- From: Greg Stark
- Re: [GENERAL] UUID's as primary keys
- Prev by Date: Re: Index corruption
- Next by Date: Re: Index corruption
- Previous by thread: Re: [GENERAL] UUID's as primary keys
- Next by thread: Re: [GENERAL] UUID's as primary keys
- Indexes: