Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Clamp last_anl_tuples to n_live_tuples, in case we vacuum a table
- From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
- To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
- Cc: "Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Clamp last_anl_tuples to n_live_tuples, in case we vacuum a table
- Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 08:22:54 +0100
- Message-id: <E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E401388BB8(at)ratbert(dot)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Tom Lane
> Sent: 27 June 2006 05:12
> To: Alvaro Herrera
> Cc: Hackers
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Clamp
> last_anl_tuples to n_live_tuples, in case we vacuum a table
>
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> > On a loosely related matter, how about changing pg_class.relpages to
> > pg_class.reldensity?
>
> IIRC, I considered this earlier, and rejected it because it
> doesn't cope
> well with the corner case relpages == 0. Also, it'll break existing
> clients that expect to find relpages and reltuples, if there are any
There are.
/D
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index