Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: vacuum row?
- From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
- To: Mark Woodward <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>
- Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: vacuum row?
- Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2006 23:29:15 -0400
- Message-id: <20060625032915(dot)GE5316(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Mark Woodward wrote: > I originally suggested a methodology for preserving MVCC and everyone is > confusing it as update "in place," this isnot what I intended. It doesn't make sense, but maybe vacuuming a page would. Naturally, it would need to wholly scan all the indexes to clean'em up, so it's probably not a good idea in general. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: vacuum row?
- From: Csaba Nagy
- Re: vacuum row?
- References:
- vacuum row?
- From: Mark Woodward
- vacuum row?
- Prev by Date: Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions
- Next by Date: Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC
- Previous by thread: vacuum row?
- Next by thread: Re: vacuum row?
- Indexes: