Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions
- From: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
- To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Charles Comiskey" <comiskey(at)us(dot)ibm(dot)com>
- Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions
- Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 19:51:05 +0200
- Message-id: <6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCEA0FA7A(at)algol(dot)sollentuna(dot)se>
> > item #2: Is dllinit.c GPL code?
> > The file dllinit.c, located in the src/utils directory
> documents the
> > author as Mumit Khan. Did Mumit Khan contribute this code
> and did he
> > contribute it for distribution under the PostgreSQL license? If I
> > read correctly, the name stamp in CVS does not indicate that Mumit
> > Khan directly contributed this file. I ask because this
> question has
> > surfaced as a forum item for a different project and Mumit Khan
> > directly answered their forum posting
> (http://curl.haxx.se/mail/lib-2002-11/0061.html).
>
> Per the comments in that thread, it would be pretty trivial
> to either rewrite or remove this file. I don't think there
> is anything there that amounts to protectable content (and
> Mumit evidently agrees, see link) but let's do something
> about it anyway. Can some of the Windows folk check whether
> we can just remove it?
I don't think it's needed on Win32. It's not included in my VC++ build,
because I forgot it :-), and it works just fine.
The point is that as long as we don't do anything in it (which we
don't), the runtime supplied default should be just fine.
I can't speak for cygwin, just standard win32.
//Magnus
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index