Re: Updatable views/with check option parsing

[Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>]

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> "The GLR parsers require a compiler for ISO C89 or later. In
>> addition, they use the inline keyword, which is not C89, but is C99
>> and is a common extension in pre-C99 compilers. It is up to the user
>> of these parsers to handle portability issues."

> We already use inline, or handle its nonexistence, respectively.

Yeah, I don't see anything in that statement that we don't assume
already.  The interesting question to me is how much different is
GLR from garden-variety bison; in particular, what's the parser
performance like?

			regards, tom lane