Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: Updatable views/with check option parsing
- From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
- To: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
- Cc: kleptog(at)svana(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: Updatable views/with check option parsing
- Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 00:23:48 +0200
- Message-id: <200605270023(dot)49267(dot)peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Andrew Dunstan wrote: > "The GLR parsers require a compiler for ISO C89 or later. In > addition, they use the inline keyword, which is not C89, but is C99 > and is a common extension in pre-C99 compilers. It is up to the user > of these parsers to handle portability issues." We already use inline, or handle its nonexistence, respectively. -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Updatable views/with check option parsing
- From: Tom Lane
- Re: Updatable views/with check option parsing
- References:
- Re: Updatable views/with check option parsing
- From: Peter Eisentraut
- Re: Updatable views/with check option parsing
- From: Andrew Dunstan
- Re: Updatable views/with check option parsing
- Prev by Date: Re: Updatable views/with check option parsing
- Next by Date: Re: Inefficient bytea escaping?
- Previous by thread: Re: Updatable views/with check option parsing
- Next by thread: Re: Updatable views/with check option parsing
- Indexes: