Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: Why is CVS server so slow?
- From: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
- To: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- Cc: "Michael Fuhr" <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>, "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: Re: Why is CVS server so slow?
- Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 21:18:07 +0200
- Message-id: <6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCEA0F9BB(at)algol(dot)sollentuna(dot)se>
> >> On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 08:30:36PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > >>> I'm logged on daily interactively, and haven't noticed > any issues ... > > > >> Are you both referring to the same server? I've noticed that > >> anoncvs.postgresql.org (66.98.251.159) has been slow for a > couple of > >> days -- it just took over five minutes to do a cvs update of HEAD > >> where it usually takes thirty seconds or less. > > > > Yeah, I was about to say the same. The master CVS server > has been OK > > (not great, but OK) for the last week or so; but I believe > the folks > > complaining are using anoncvs. > > Anyone noticing any network issues? I just looked over the > server itself, swapping a *little* bit, but vmstat shows the > disks aren't busy ... and nothing unusual taking up CPU on > the server itself ... anoncvs is on svr4, right? It's been dead slow due to spam getting trapped in a loop because of configuration errors (see other mails with details on what we need to do to fix that). //Magnus
- Prev by Date: Re: Why is CVS server so slow?
- Next by Date: Re: Further reduction of bufmgr lock contention
- Previous by thread: Re: Why is CVS server so slow?
- Next by thread: file-locking and postmaster.pid
- Indexes: