Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: Is a SERIAL column a "black box", or not?
- From: Thomas Hallgren <thomas(at)tada(dot)se>
- To: Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca>
- Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: Is a SERIAL column a "black box", or not?
- Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 12:29:08 +0200
Rod Taylor wrote:
I concur with this. But to really break out from the current middle ground, you must implement the IDENTITY and also document the SERIAL macro as deprecated.If SERIAL is going to be kept long term, then it should be the macro version so it doesn't appear too duplicated.
Regards, Thomas Hallgren
- References:
- Is a SERIAL column a "black box", or not?
- From: Tom Lane
- Re: Is a SERIAL column a "black box", or not?
- From: Rod Taylor
- Re: Is a SERIAL column a "black box", or not?
- From: Tom Lane
- Re: Is a SERIAL column a "black box", or not?
- From: Rod Taylor
- Is a SERIAL column a "black box", or not?
- Prev by Date: Re: Is a SERIAL column a "black box", or not?
- Next by Date: Re: Is a SERIAL column a "black box", or not?
- Previous by thread: Re: Is a SERIAL column a "black box", or not?
- Next by thread: Re: Is a SERIAL column a "black box", or not?
- Indexes: