Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: [GENERAL] Concurrency problem building indexes
- From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- To: Wes <wespvp(at)syntegra(dot)com>
- Cc: "Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "wes(dot)palmer(at)bt(dot)com" <wes(dot)palmer(at)bt(dot)com>
- Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Concurrency problem building indexes
- Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 03:18:06 -0400
- Message-id: <13641(dot)1145949486(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Wes <wespvp(at)syntegra(dot)com> writes: > On 4/25/06 1:01 AM, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote: >>> Where do you want me to send it to? >> >> pgsql-bugs would be appropriate. > It's not that small that I would want to post it to a list. Also, I think > I've sanitized the data, but I wouldn't want to post it on a public list. So invent some made-up data. I'd be seriously surprised if this behavior has anything to do with the precise data being indexed. Experiment around till you've got something you don't mind posting that exhibits the behavior you see. regards, tom lane
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: [GENERAL] Concurrency problem building indexes
- Next by Date: Re: TODO Item: ACL_CONNECT
- Previous by thread: Re: [GENERAL] Concurrency problem building indexes
- Next by thread: Re: [GENERAL] Concurrency problem building indexes
- Indexes: