Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: WAL dirty-buffer management bug
- From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
- To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
- Subject: Re: WAL dirty-buffer management bug
- Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 17:46:39 +0100
On Fri, 2006-03-31 at 09:36 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes: > > Problem for indexes only. heap xlrecs don't specify exact insert points > > Sure they do. They had better, else (for example) the associated index > insertions will be wrong. Yep, you're right. Best Regards, Simon Riggs
- References:
- WAL dirty-buffer management bug
- From: Tom Lane
- Re: WAL dirty-buffer management bug
- From: Simon Riggs
- Re: WAL dirty-buffer management bug
- From: Tom Lane
- WAL dirty-buffer management bug
- Prev by Date: Re: pg_class catalog question...
- Next by Date: Re: Index vacuum improvements
- Previous by thread: Re: WAL dirty-buffer management bug
- Next by thread: Re: WAL dirty-buffer management bug
- Indexes: