Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: Shared memory
- From: Thomas Hallgren <thomas(at)tada(dot)se>
- To: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
- Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PL/Java Development <Pljava-dev(at)gborg(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: Re: Shared memory
- Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 21:21:11 +0200
- Message-id: <44298CA7(dot)3030000(at)tada(dot)se>
Dave Cramer wrote:
Last time I tried to use pl-j (in order to build a mutual test platform), I didn't manage to make it compile due to missing artifacts and it wasn't ported to Windows. Lazslo filed a JIRA bug on that but since then (August last year) I've seen no activity in the project. Is it still alive? Is anyone using it?What exactly is a FENCED solution ? If it is simply a remote connection to a single JVM then pl-j already does that.
Regards, Thomas Hallgren
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Shared memory
- From: Dave Cramer
- Re: Shared memory
- References:
- Shared memory
- From: Thomas Hallgren
- Re: Shared memory
- From: Martijn van Oosterhout
- Re: Shared memory
- From: Thomas Hallgren
- Re: Shared memory
- From: Tom Lane
- Re: Shared memory
- From: Thomas Hallgren
- Re: Shared memory
- From: Simon Riggs
- Re: Shared memory
- From: Thomas Hallgren
- Re: Shared memory
- From: Dave Cramer
- Shared memory
- Prev by Date: autovacuum: could not access status of transaction
- Next by Date: Re: Shared memory
- Previous by thread: Re: Shared memory
- Next by thread: Re: Shared memory
- Indexes: