Re: Nightly builds
- From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
- Cc: "Davidson, Robert" <robdavid(at)amazon(dot)com>, "Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: Nightly builds
- Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 10:12:27 -0500
- Message-id: <4662(dot)1143213147(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Davidson, Robert wrote:
>> If there were a place to download patches, this would allow moderately adventurous Windows users to roll their own and avoid the overhead of nightly Windows builds.
> ... you shouldn't need to apply patches directly, unless you are
> testing to assist the patch author.
In any case, patches that are done but not yet applied would be
available from the pgsql-patches archives. Assuming you've got a copy
of "patch" or equivalent, you could cherry-pick unapplied stuff from
there.
This is all old hat to longtime Unix users, but I think it's a vanishing
skill among newer ones because of the prevalence of package-based
distributions. And of course Windows and Mac users are completely
unaccustomed to the idea of rolling their own builds. Documentation
wouldn't be a bad idea.
regards, tom lane
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index