Re: Pl/Python -- current maintainer?

Peripheral Links

From: "Michael Paesold" <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at>
To: "James William Pye" <pgsql(at)jwp(dot)name>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Tino Wildenhain" <tino(at)wildenhain(dot)de>, "James Robinson" <jlrobins(at)socialserve(dot)com>, "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Hackers Development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Pl/Python -- current maintainer?
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 19:36:01 +0100
Message-id: <005a01c63b03$80a27930$0f01a8c0(at)zaphod>

James William Pye wrote:

On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 01:08:52PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:

That design is broken on its face, as the system does not guarantee to
call the validator.

Hrm. Other than language creations that do not specify a validator, atwhat

times will Postgres not call the validator upon function creation?


SET check_function_bodies = off;


Best Regards,

Michael Paesold

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Pl/Python -- current maintainer?
  - From: James William Pye

References:
- Pl/Python -- current maintainer?
  - From: James Robinson
- Re: Pl/Python -- current maintainer?
  - From: Joshua D. Drake
- Re: Pl/Python -- current maintainer?
  - From: James Robinson
- Re: Pl/Python -- current maintainer?
  - From: Tino Wildenhain
- Re: Pl/Python -- current maintainer?
  - From: James William Pye
- Re: Pl/Python -- current maintainer?
  - From: Alvaro Herrera
- Re: Pl/Python -- current maintainer?
  - From: James William Pye
- Re: Pl/Python -- current maintainer?
  - From: Tom Lane
- Re: Pl/Python -- current maintainer?
  - From: James William Pye

Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Search for
	Advanced Search