Re: Pl/Python -- current maintainer?
- From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- To: James William Pye <pgsql(at)jwp(dot)name>
- Cc: Tino Wildenhain <tino(at)wildenhain(dot)de>, James Robinson <jlrobins(at)socialserve(dot)com>, "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Hackers Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: Re: Pl/Python -- current maintainer?
- Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 13:08:52 -0500
- Message-id: <19913(dot)1140977332(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
James William Pye <pgsql(at)jwp(dot)name> writes:
> On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 06:36:19PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> I'm not sure it's an issue now that we have pg_pltemplate, but in older
>> versions it's possible to create a language without setting a validator.
>> This would make the validator an unsuitable place for checking the
>> restrictions.
> Hrm. I think this would only be an issue in PL/Py is if the user had the ability
> to alter probin. The handler will never directly execute code in prosrc; it
> relies on a validator to fill in probin.
That design is broken on its face, as the system does not guarantee to
call the validator.
regards, tom lane
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index