Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: User privileges-verification required
- From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
- To: Nauman Naeem <nauman(dot)naeem(at)gmail(dot)com>
- Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: User privileges-verification required
- Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 13:04:41 +0800
- Message-id: <440136E9(dot)8090700(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
In my opinion we should cater for such a situation, and two possible solutions come to my mind for this:
I've done exactly this before, and had to use single user mode to recover. Annoying.
1. Place a restriction that there should be more than one superuser before you can issue a "NOCREATEUSER" command.
I agree :) Chris
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: User privileges-verification required
- From: Nauman Naeem
- Re: User privileges-verification required
- References:
- User privileges-verification required
- From: Nauman Naeem
- User privileges-verification required
- Prev by Date: Re: TOAST compression
- Next by Date: Re: constraints and sql92 information_schema compliance
- Previous by thread: Re: User privileges-verification required
- Next by thread: Re: User privileges-verification required
- Indexes: