Re: constraints and sql92 information_schema compliance
- From: "Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
- To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
- Cc: Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>, "Clark C. Evans" <cce(at)clarkevans(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: constraints and sql92 information_schema compliance
- Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 16:28:16 -0600
- Message-id: <20060225222816(dot)GL82012(at)pervasive(dot)com>
On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 11:51:55AM -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Bruno,
>
> > This has been discussed previously in a couple of threads. I believe the
> > desire is to make it work as specified in SQL-2003, but I do not remember
> > whether or not anyone volunteered to do the work to make it happen.
>
> I believe that the newsysviews follow the SQL03 permissions structure.
Does SQL03 specify a different name for info schema? Should we morph
newsysviews to that?
Of course this still leaves the issue of how to deal with
PostgreSQL-specific stuff that isn't in infoschema, since we probably
don't want to be adding extra stuff there.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index