Re: Adding an ignore list to pg_restore, prototype patch #1
- From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- To: Martin Pitt <mpitt(at)debian(dot)org>
- Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
- Subject: Re: Adding an ignore list to pg_restore, prototype patch #1
- Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 12:18:39 -0500
- Message-id: <11637(dot)1140887919(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Martin Pitt <mpitt(at)debian(dot)org> writes:
> Martin Pitt [2006-02-19 14:39 +0100]:
>> Since this changes the behaviour of pg_restore, this should probably
>> become an option, e. g. -D / --ignore-existing-table-data. I'll do
>> this if you agree to the principle of the current patch.
> I improved the patch now to only ignore TABLE DATA for existing tables
> if '-X ignore-existing-tables' is specified. I also updated the
> documentation.
This patch is unbelievably ugly and probably vulnerable to coredumps.
Please use a cleaner way of disabling the subsequent load than tromping
all over the TOC datastructure, ie, not this:
> + strcpy (tes->desc, "IGNOREDATA");
BTW, I'm pretty sure it fails for tables with same names in different
schemas, too.
regards, tom lane
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index