Skip site navigation
(1)
Skip section navigation
(2)
Search
Peripheral Links
Text Size:
Normal
/
Large
Donate
Contact
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Home
About
Downloads
Documentation
Community
Developers
Support
Section Navigation
Community
Contributors
Mailing Lists
Subscribe
User lists
Developer lists
pgsql-cluster-hackers
pgsql-committers
pgsql-hackers
pgsql-rrreviewers
pgsql-testers
pgsql-www
Regional lists
Associations
User groups
Project lists
Inactive lists
IRC
Featured Users
International Sites
Propaganda
Resources
Weekly News
Community login
Profile
Lost password
Search archives
Advanced Search
pgsql-hackers 2006-01 Thread Index (4/6)
Last updated: Wed Sep 30 01:31:04 2009
1038 messages
Main Index
[
Prev Page
]
[
Next Page
]
Re: pgxs/windows
,
(continued)
Re: pgxs/windows
Andrew Dunstan (Mon 16 00:41)
Re: pgxs/windows
Tom Lane (Mon 16 01:00)
Re: pgxs/windows
Bruce Momjian (Wed 18 23:25)
Re: pgxs/windows
Andrew Dunstan (Thu 19 00:17)
Re: pgxs/windows
Bruce Momjian (Thu 19 03:03)
Re: pgxs/windows
Bruce Momjian (Thu 19 04:48)
Re: pgxs/windows
Andrew Dunstan (Thu 19 12:48)
Coding standards? Recommendations?
korry (Sun 15 16:11)
Re: Coding standards? Recommendations?
James William Pye (Sun 15 16:38)
Re: Coding standards? Recommendations?
korry (Sun 15 18:59)
Re: Coding standards? Recommendations?
Simon Riggs (Mon 16 08:35)
Re: [PATCHES] Fix for running from admin account on win32
Magnus Hagander (Sat 14 18:16)
Re: [PATCHES] Fix for running from admin account on win32
Tom Lane (Sat 14 18:44)
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [PATCHES] Fix for running from admin account on win32
Magnus Hagander (Sat 14 20:20)
Surrogate keys (Was: enums)
Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA (Sat 14 10:20)
Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums)
Michael Glaesemann (Sat 14 10:28)
Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums)
Lukas Smith (Sat 14 10:34)
Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums)
Jim C. Nasby (Mon 16 18:52)
Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums)
Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA (Wed 18 13:09)
Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums)
Martijn van Oosterhout (Wed 18 13:32)
Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums)
Josh Berkus (Wed 18 23:53)
Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums)
Martijn van Oosterhout (Thu 19 07:27)
Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums)
Josh Berkus (Thu 19 18:09)
Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums)
Martijn van Oosterhout (Thu 19 21:29)
Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums)
Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete Dutra (Sun 29 01:49)
Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums)
Michael Glaesemann (Wed 18 13:56)
Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums)
Jim C. Nasby (Wed 18 19:12)
Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums)
Rod Taylor (Sat 14 15:32)
Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums)
Lukas Smith (Sat 14 15:42)
Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums)
mark (Sat 14 16:08)
Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums)
Martijn van Oosterhout (Sat 14 20:33)
Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums)
mark (Sat 14 21:09)
Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums)
Greg Stark (Sun 15 05:08)
Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums)
Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA (Wed 18 13:21)
Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums)
Greg Stark (Wed 18 14:53)
<Possible follow-ups>
FW: Surrogate keys (Was: enums)
Jim Nasby (Wed 18 22:47)
Re: FW: Surrogate keys (Was: enums)
Jim C. Nasby (Wed 18 23:23)
Re: FW: Surrogate keys (Was: enums)
Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete Dutra (Thu 19 00:31)
Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums)
Michael Glaesemann (Thu 19 00:54)
Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums)
Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete Dutra (Thu 19 08:23)
Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums)
Dann Corbit (Thu 19 00:03)
Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums)
Dann Corbit (Thu 19 00:06)
Re: FW: Surrogate keys (Was: enums)
Dann Corbit (Thu 19 01:34)
Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums)
Michael Glaesemann (Thu 19 01:47)
Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums)
Tom Lane (Thu 19 05:06)
Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums)
Greg Stark (Thu 19 06:46)
Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums)
David Fetter (Thu 19 08:50)
Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums)
Martijn van Oosterhout (Thu 19 09:05)
Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums)
Bruno Wolff III (Tue 24 09:50)
Re: FW: Surrogate keys (Was: enums)
Josh Berkus (Thu 19 03:13)
Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums)
Dann Corbit (Thu 19 01:51)
Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums)
Pollard, Mike (Thu 19 14:37)
Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums)
mark (Thu 19 14:53)
Re: Surrogate keys
Chris Browne (Thu 19 16:04)
Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums)
Christopher Kings-Lynne (Fri 20 01:44)
Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums)
Michael Glaesemann (Fri 20 02:41)
Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums)
Bruno Wolff III (Tue 24 09:57)
Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums)
Jim C. Nasby (Thu 19 17:42)
Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums)
Josh Berkus (Thu 19 18:17)
Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums)
mark (Thu 19 19:02)
Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums)
Jim C. Nasby (Thu 19 19:48)
Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums)
mark (Thu 19 20:11)
Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums)
Mike Rylander (Fri 20 21:34)
Re: Surrogate keys
Christopher Browne (Sat 21 03:38)
Re: Surrogate keys
Mike Rylander (Sat 21 04:51)
Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums)
Dann Corbit (Thu 19 19:22)
Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums)
Jim C. Nasby (Thu 19 19:59)
Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums)
Richard Huxton (Fri 20 14:01)
Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums)
Martijn van Oosterhout (Fri 20 14:37)
message for constraint
Jaime Casanova (Sat 14 04:53)
Re: message for constraint
Peter Eisentraut (Sat 14 09:13)
Re: message for constraint
Jaime Casanova (Sat 14 16:17)
simple utility commands (src/backend/commands)
Gevik babakhani (Fri 13 21:39)
Re: simple utility commands (src/backend/commands)
Jonah H. Harris (Fri 13 22:17)
Control File
Bruno Almeida do Lago (Fri 13 16:13)
Re: Control File
Qingqing Zhou (Fri 13 18:05)
PostgreSQL win32 & NT4
Magnus Hagander (Fri 13 13:40)
Re: PostgreSQL win32 & NT4
pmagnoli (Fri 13 13:51)
Re: PostgreSQL win32 & NT4
Bruce Momjian (Mon 16 19:20)
Re: PostgreSQL win32 & NT4
Joshua D. Drake (Mon 16 19:23)
Re: PostgreSQL win32 & NT4
Qingqing Zhou (Fri 13 18:10)
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: PostgreSQL win32 & NT4
Magnus Hagander (Fri 13 18:26)
Re: PostgreSQL win32 & NT4
Magnus Hagander (Mon 16 19:32)
Re: PostgreSQL win32 & NT4
Bruce Momjian (Mon 16 19:33)
C++ -> C : Module for converting the WHERE clause to the canonical form with PostgreSQL
St Valentine (Fri 13 10:52)
Re: C++ -> C : Module for converting the WHERE clause to the canonical form with PostgreSQL
Tom Lane (Fri 13 15:24)
GRANT/REVOKE column-level privileges
kevin brintnall (Fri 13 09:37)
Re: GRANT/REVOKE column-level privileges
Martijn van Oosterhout (Fri 13 10:20)
Re: GRANT/REVOKE column-level privileges
Tom Lane (Fri 13 15:04)
Re: GRANT/REVOKE column-level privileges
kevin brintnall (Fri 13 15:52)
Re: [SQL] info is a reserved word?
Tom Lane (Fri 13 05:10)
Re: Please Help: PostgreSQL Query Optimizer
Anjan Kumar. A. (Thu 12 23:33)
Contrib Schemas
David Fetter (Thu 12 22:46)
Re: Contrib Schemas
Mark Kirkwood (Thu 12 23:16)
Re: Contrib Schemas
Christopher Kings-Lynne (Fri 13 01:58)
Re: Contrib Schemas
John DeSoi (Fri 13 04:34)
Re: Contrib Schemas
Josh Berkus (Fri 13 19:28)
Re: Contrib Schemas
John DeSoi (Fri 13 21:17)
Re: Contrib Schemas
Andrew Dunstan (Thu 12 23:33)
Re: Contrib Schemas
Tom Lane (Fri 13 00:33)
Re: Contrib Schemas
Josh Berkus (Fri 13 01:05)
Re: Contrib Schemas
Simon Riggs (Fri 13 19:26)
Checkpoint question
Qingqing Zhou (Wed 11 23:24)
Re: Checkpoint question
Simon Riggs (Thu 12 01:03)
Re: Checkpoint question
Qingqing Zhou (Thu 12 01:46)
Re: Checkpoint question
Simon Riggs (Thu 12 08:58)
Re: Checkpoint question
Tom Lane (Thu 12 03:12)
Re: Checkpoint question
Qingqing Zhou (Thu 12 03:33)
Re: Checkpoint question
Simon Riggs (Thu 12 09:08)
Re: Checkpoint question
Tom Lane (Thu 12 09:15)
Re: Checkpoint question
Qingqing Zhou (Thu 12 09:50)
Re: Checkpoint question
Jim C. Nasby (Thu 12 21:53)
Re: Checkpoint question
Qingqing Zhou (Thu 12 22:00)
Re: Checkpoint question
Jim C. Nasby (Fri 13 18:40)
Re: Checkpoint question
Qingqing Zhou (Thu 12 03:34)
sort operation leads planner to different number of rows?
Robert Treat (Wed 11 21:31)
Re: sort operation leads planner to different number of rows?
Tom Lane (Wed 11 21:39)
FW: Intermittent Stats Failiures: firefly: HEAD
Larry Rosenman (Wed 11 16:10)
Re: FW: Intermittent Stats Failiures: firefly: HEAD
Tom Lane (Wed 11 20:31)
PG process architecture
Milen Kulev (Wed 11 14:42)
Re: PG process architecture
Tom Lane (Wed 11 15:37)
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: PG process architecture
Milen Kulev (Wed 11 15:38)
Re: PG process architecture
Joshua D. Drake (Wed 11 16:02)
Re: PG process architecture
Denis Lussier (Sat 14 16:40)
Overflow of bgwriter's request queue
ITAGAKI Takahiro (Wed 11 10:33)
Re: Overflow of bgwriter's request queue
Tom Lane (Wed 11 18:16)
Re: Overflow of bgwriter's request queue
ITAGAKI Takahiro (Fri 13 04:48)
leaks in TopMemoryContext?
Neil Conway (Wed 11 07:45)
Re: leaks in TopMemoryContext?
Tom Lane (Wed 11 07:58)
Re: leaks in TopMemoryContext?
Neil Conway (Wed 11 08:06)
Re: leaks in TopMemoryContext?
Tom Lane (Wed 11 14:53)
cvs update taking a long time
Michael Fuhr (Wed 11 02:44)
Re: cvs update taking a long time
Michael Fuhr (Wed 11 02:45)
Re: cvs update taking a long time
Marc G. Fournier (Wed 11 03:39)
Is Optimizer smart enough?
tmorelli (Tue 10 23:50)
Re: Is Optimizer smart enough?
Tom Lane (Wed 11 05:08)
Re: [COMMITTERS] A question about index internals
Jaime Casanova (Tue 10 22:55)
Question about Postgresql time fields(possible bug)
Tony Caduto (Tue 10 15:37)
Re: Question about Postgresql time fields(possible bug)
Bruce Momjian (Tue 10 15:51)
Re: Question about Postgresql time fields(possible bug)
Harald Fuchs (Tue 10 16:55)
Re: Question about Postgresql time fields(possible bug)
Tom Lane (Tue 10 17:15)
Re: Question about Postgresql time fields(possible bug)
Harald Fuchs (Tue 10 17:47)
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Question about Postgresql time fields(possible bug)
Dave Page (Tue 10 15:56)
Re: Question about Postgresql time fields(possible bug)
Dave Page (Tue 10 17:15)
Re: Question about Postgresql time fields(possible bug)
Dave Page (Tue 10 20:51)
Re: Question about Postgresql time fields(possible bug)
Josh Berkus (Tue 10 21:08)
Re: Question about Postgresql time fields(possible bug)
Tom Lane (Tue 10 21:12)
Re: Question about Postgresql time fields(possible bug)
Tony Caduto (Wed 11 03:52)
current_setting returns 'unset'
Peter Eisentraut (Tue 10 11:24)
Re: current_setting returns 'unset'
Tom Lane (Tue 10 15:32)
Re: current_setting returns 'unset'
Peter Eisentraut (Tue 10 15:32)
Re: current_setting returns 'unset'
Tom Lane (Tue 10 16:26)
Re: current_setting returns 'unset'
Joe Conway (Tue 10 15:32)
Re: PLs and domain constraints
Thomas Hallgren (Mon 09 19:23)
Re: PLs and domain constraints
Tom Lane (Mon 09 19:28)
Re: PLs and domain constraints
Neil Conway (Mon 09 19:29)
Re: [PATCHES] plpgsql: check domain constraints
Tom Lane (Mon 09 18:20)
=?windows-874?b?vrnRoafSubjYw6HSw8LYpOPLweggTW9kZXJuIE9mZmljZSBNYW5hZ2VtZW50IFN5c3RlbQ==?=
Waso Training Center (Mon 09 04:05)
TODO: Allow INET + INT4 to increment the host part of the address
kevin brintnall (Mon 09 03:29)
Re: TODO: Allow INET + INT4 to increment the host part of the address
Tom Lane (Mon 09 03:35)
Fw: Returned mail: see transcript for details
Jim Buttafuoco (Mon 09 01:17)
lookup_rowtype_tupdesc considered harmful
Tom Lane (Mon 09 01:04)
Re: lookup_rowtype_tupdesc considered harmful
Neil Conway (Mon 09 17:17)
Re: lookup_rowtype_tupdesc considered harmful
Tom Lane (Mon 09 17:57)
Re: lookup_rowtype_tupdesc considered harmful
Neil Conway (Mon 09 19:42)
Re: lookup_rowtype_tupdesc considered harmful
Tom Lane (Mon 09 19:51)
Re: lookup_rowtype_tupdesc considered harmful
Neil Conway (Mon 09 22:38)
Re: lookup_rowtype_tupdesc considered harmful
Tom Lane (Mon 09 22:49)
Re: lookup_rowtype_tupdesc considered harmful
Tom Lane (Tue 10 15:31)
Re: lookup_rowtype_tupdesc considered harmful
Neil Conway (Tue 10 15:32)
cleaning up plperl warnings
Andrew Dunstan (Sun 08 22:14)
Re: cleaning up plperl warnings
Bruce Momjian (Mon 09 23:11)
Re: cleaning up plperl warnings
Andrew Dunstan (Tue 10 01:06)
Fw: Is anyone interested in getting PostgreSQL working on mips[el]?
Jim Buttafuoco (Sun 08 14:52)
Re: Fw: Is anyone interested in getting PostgreSQL working
Stefan Kaltenbrunner (Mon 09 07:55)
Re: Fw: Is anyone interested in getting PostgreSQL working
Jim Buttafuoco (Mon 09 13:40)
Re: Fw: Is anyone interested in getting PostgreSQL working
Stefan Kaltenbrunner (Mon 09 14:03)
Re: Fw: Is anyone interested in getting PostgreSQL working
Jim Buttafuoco (Mon 09 14:21)
Re: Fw: Is anyone interested in getting PostgreSQL working
Kurt Roeckx (Mon 09 16:21)
Re: Fw: Is anyone interested in getting PostgreSQL working
Jim Buttafuoco (Mon 09 16:47)
Main Index
[
Prev Page
]
[
Next Page
]
Mail converted by
MHonArc
Privacy Policy
| PostgreSQL Archives hosted by
Command Prompt, Inc.
| Designed by
tinysofa
Copyright © 1996 – 2008 PostgreSQL Global Development Group