Re: Policy on schema-qualified names
- From: Joachim Wieland <joe(at)mcknight(dot)de>
- To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: Policy on schema-qualified names
- Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 20:43:21 +0100
- Message-id: <20060131194321(dot)GA5959(at)mcknight(dot)de>
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 01:46:42PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> The direction that we ought to be going in is to add separate fields to
> error reports that contain just the names of the relevant objects (without
> any other decoration). This is needed anyway to allow client-side
> programs to extract the information without having to parse human-readable
> text messages ... and IIRC it's required by some part of the SQL spec,
> too.
Agreed. I didn't know about that part but with this in mind it would be a
waste of time to check all of the the messages at this time and make them
conform in some way.
Thanks for the explanation,
Joachim
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index