Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums)
- From: Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)myrealbox(dot)com>
- To: Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA <leandro(at)dutra(dot)fastmail(dot)fm>
- Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums)
- Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 22:56:14 +0900
- Message-id: <C17C695B-BEDB-4BA8-843C-9A1EF7AAF00C@myrealbox.com> <text/plain>
On Jan 18, 2006, at 22:08 , Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA wrote:
Jim C. Nasby <jnasby <at> pervasive.com> writes:a) the optimizer does a really poor job on multi-column index statisticsSo it should be fixed?
Of course! Patches welcome! Michael Glaesemann grzm myrealbox com
- References:
- Surrogate keys (Was: enums)
- From: Leandro GuimarÃes Faria Corcete DUTRA
- Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums)
- From: Michael Glaesemann
- Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums)
- From: Jim C. Nasby
- Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums)
- From: Leandro GuimarÃes Faria Corcete DUTRA
- Surrogate keys (Was: enums)
- Prev by Date: Re: enums
- Next by Date: Unique constraints for non-btree indexes
- Previous by thread: Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums)
- Next by thread: Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums)
- Indexes: